The Turkewitz Law Firm

New York Personal Injury Attorney ♦ Medical Malpractice ♦ Trial Lawyer

Serving Manhattan, Bronx, Brooklyn, Queens, Staten Island, Rockland, Dutchess, Westchester, Nassau & Suffolk Counties
Eric Turkewitz
228 E. 45 St., 17th Floor
New York, NY 10017
Phone: (212) 983-5900

What is Medical Malpractice in New York?

When lawyers analyze medical malpractice cases, we work backwards. That is to say, we start with the law that the judge will give to a jury at the end of a trial – which is an event that may be a few years away from the intake of a case. But it is that law that guides the analysis.

There are three essential parts:

  1. Negligence
  2. Causation
  3. Damages

Medical malpractice is negligence by a medical professional (doctor, nurse, physician’s assistant, etc.). It is, in the language of the law, a departure from customary and usual medical practice.

Or, as I like to say, it’s similar to backing out of a driveway without looking.

Many of the cases are defended on another principle that the judge will give to the jury before it deliberates. And that is, that “mere errors of judgment” are not negligence.

It is this conflict – is something a departure from good practice or a mere error of judgment? – that underpins many malpractice cases. This, oft-times, runs headlong into a “battle of the experts” with some saying there is a departure from practice and others saying it was just an error of judgment.

Given the huge reluctance by juries in bringing back verdicts against medical professionals, these concepts lead to malpractice attorneys being very selective in the cases that we take. You can read about the vetting process here.

Assuming one gets past the hurdle of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the medical professional was negligent, you must still prove that it was a substantial cause of injury.

Now this part about being “a” cause, as opposed to “the” cause, is important, for injuries may come from multiple causes.  As an example, a woman goes to a doctor with a lump in her breast and the doctor says, “Don’t worry about it.” Ten months later the cancer is found. The doctor didn’t give her the cancer, but did contribute to the delay in prompt and proper treatment.  There are therefore, multiple causes of advanced disease.

In a malpractice suite, the doctor would only be liable in such a case for the additional injury caused by the delay.

The third part is damages. In the above example regarding the failure to promptly and properly treat breast cancer the doctor is responsible only for that part s/he caused. But remember, this part only comes up if the jury finds both negligence and causation.

A final note:
Sometimes, a lawyer will do the analysis in reverse, and start with damages. Why, since a jury doesn’t even discuss damages without negligence and causation?

Because medical malpractice cases are so very expensive, difficult and time-consuming, it is often true that the extent of the injury simply doesn’t warrant the other analysis. In other words, with smaller injuries, the medical community enjoys de facto immunity from suit.

You can see a list of medical malpractice cases that Turkewitz has handled at this link.


Updated: 3/2/2016
Copyright 20062017 Eric Turkewitz & The Turkewitz Law Firm
Web Site Design, Hosting, & Domain Name Services by Skylark NetWorks, Valley Stream, NY

2011 ABA Journal Blawg 100